How important was nationalism as a cause of the collapse of communism Essay

How important was home(a)ism as a cause of the collapse of collectivism in Eastern Europe - Essay ExampleIn this paper, the term contentism is used in the meaning of political doctrine and ideology which is justified by a goal to make a certain nation succeed in pursuing its interests. In this context, a nation is understood as a political, ethnic, territorial, pagan, or religious group united by a mutual economy, mass culture, common legal rights and duties, and a belief system that emphasizes either shared history and genealogy or early(a) common myths distinguishing this group from others (Smith, 1991 14). Molchanov (2000 264) observes that field of studyism today is a product of modernization as well as mass education. It is also a product of the elites conscious manipulation of countrys masses. Nationalism is base on national feeling, i.e. a feeling of belonging to a community which is culturally distinct and goes beyond peoples circles of important others, c all overs t he barriers of statuses and classes, and on a legitimate basis commands its members loyalty. In this respect, a national community is perceived as an imagined community with its contours being reconstructed during the process of national mobilization (Molchanov, 2000 263). As for the national elite, it serves a mobilizing agent in this process. Its parochial interests get the status of national interests and become determine for which all compatriots fight. Typically, the elite is made up of well-educated classes from the indigenous nationality and local administrators who pee become dissatisfied with current social standing (Molchanov, 2000 264). ... It is also a product of the elites conscious manipulation of countrys masses. Nationalism is based on national feeling, i.e. a feeling of belonging to a community which is culturally distinct and goes beyond peoples circles of important others, covers the barriers of statuses and classes, and on a legitimate basis commands its member s loyalty. In this respect, a national community is perceived as an imagined community with its contours being reconstructed during the process of national mobilization (Molchanov, 2000 263). As for the national elite, it serves a mobilizing agent in this process. Its parochial interests get the status of national interests and become values for which all compatriots fight. Typically, the elite is made up of well-educated classes from the indigenous nationality and local administrators who have become dissatisfied with current social standing (Molchanov, 2000 264). Exploring the political agenda of contemporary nationalism, one may state that it necessarily develops in its connection to state (Tibor, 2010 36). The relationship between nationalism and the state is discussed in two major modes. The first one describes the situation when the representatives of the indigenous nationality already have control over the state. They make efforts to unite people and create their specific n ation. It is characterized by a focus on cultural and linguistic homogenization, consolidation of political connections, and creating the feeling of solidarity. The activity of the government results in education standardization and lessening of the social distance which may be found between the society layers (Gellner, 1998). The second mode of nationalism development within the state is when the elites do not possess control over